I couldn't bear that. I need a moon to stare at, planets to emerge to the naked eye at various points through the year. I need stars to crackle like tiny little bonfires roaring silently. I need burnishing strings upon strings of constellations, most of whose names escape me. I need deep, pulverizing cosmic abyss. What gives me such profound amazement is to simply contemplate how old everything is and our relation to that. How some of those stars are in fact dead and gone, but here where we are they appear vibrant and effulgent. How when I peer towards the sky it's as if I'm looking down a massive telescopic widescreen lens through eons and eons of time. All this gives me a dual sense of microscopic unimportance and a small but no less vital role in something monstrous. The sky is a mostly illegible cosmic timetable that tells the longest story in the world, one that involves us. And the story keeps getting older, keeps getting deeper, keeps getting interesting. For small creatures such as we, Sagan once said, the vastness is bearable only through love.
With that in mind, I'm obviously ecstatic when there's new astrological photography released, especially NewScientist's Award Winning Series', which are time and time again breathtaking. The photo near the top of this post is my favorite. Below is a close second, Mars shining in the top left-hand corner.
i was like ooh porn, then aw, not porn
ReplyDeletejust kidding....